So I asked Natan if it were true what the business development gurus say. Does a small business that builds enduring structures and consistent processes and human resources functions--and relies less on a charismatic founder and more on the whole team--become more valuable to a prospective buyer? The answer was yes, he said emphatically, particularly in any service-intensive industry, such as the financial advice biz. Our cover story this month by Managing Editor Bob Keane (here) focuses on a new breed of advisory firm that wholeheartedly embraces a business model, personified by COO Krishna Pendyala. But Natan, who most often represents sellers with an occasional foray into the buy side, had much more to say of interest to advisors. In his experience, buyers--financial or strategic--are much more sophisticated than sellers. Often, when a company owner wants to sell, the owner's advisors--legal, accounting, even wealth managers--are not up to the task, unless they have significant prior experience. Moreover, it might not be in some of those advisors' own interests for the client to sell: "When a company is sold, the investment advisor/wealth manager is going to grow their business; the accountant is going to lose a client." There's also plenty of money looking for a place to invest, despite the tightening credit arising from the subprime mess: "There are 6,000 private equity firms out there." It takes time to match a buyer, too. "We try to value a [selling] company before we represent them," in order to "set accurate expectations" for the seller.
"We sell things," notes Natan about his firm, Aquetong Capital Advisors, but he says it's the wealth manager's job to understand the seller's long-term charitable, inter-generational, and retirement needs that the rush of liquidity can help address, not to get involved during the actual sale process. An advisor, in other words, has to know her own limitations.



