More On Legal & Compliancefrom The Advisor's Professional Library
- Differences Between State and SEC Regulation of Investment Advisors States may impose licensing or registration requirements on IARs doing business in their jurisdiction, even if the IAR works for an SEC-registered firm. States may investigate and prosecute fraud by any IAR in their jurisdiction, even if the individual works for an SEC-registered firm.
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Information This information sheet contains general information about certain provisions of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and selected rules under the Advisers Act. It also provides information about the resources available from the SEC to help advisors understand and comply with these laws and rules.
And on it goes. A class action suit brought by plaintiffs’ attorneys against Charles Schwab & Co. over the investment giant’s YieldPlus Fund appears to be settled.
The suit stems from investments contained within the YieldPlus portfolio, which included mortgage-backed securities and other credit instruments that declined significantly during the worldwide economic crisis beginning in late 2007.
“Schwab met with the plaintiffs’ attorneys and reached an agreement,” said Schwab spokesperson Greg Gable. “We had a hearing Thursday and the judge said he will rule on the agreement sometime soon, which we believe might be early next week.”
The case has been marked by on-again, off-again agreements between the two parties. The most recent agreement was called off by Schwab on Nov. 8 when the company notified the court it was backing out.
Schwab said it notified counsel for the plaintiffs that it was backing out of the agreement because plaintiff lawyers claimed the settlement was not all-encompassing, and they still had legal right to sue the company on behalf of other investors.
According to Schwab, in the spring of 2010 it agreed to a settlement of $235 million to settle all claims in the YieldPlus class action proceedings, regardless of their merit. Schwab said it was fully prepared to contest the allegations at trial but “wanted to provide significant and speedy financial benefit to valued clients who purchased or held the fund during the period covered by the lawsuit and to put the matter behind us.” Plaintiffs' lawyers at the time praised the settlement as one in which clients would receive "real money" and "a high percentage of recovery."
The company argues that until the credit crisis, the YieldPlus Fund was consistently one of the best performing funds in its category for eight years and held a Morningstar 5-star rating from December 2004 through September 2007. Even in the face of the credit crisis, the company notes YieldPlus shareholders lost, on average, only 7.5% of their investment when dividends are counted.