U.K. Life Settlement Funds Expanding

In the last couple of years, U.S. life settlement funds have made significant inroads into the U.K. Last year, the U.K.'s securities regulator, the Financial Services Authority (FSA), began approving life settlement funds—opening life settlements to U.K. investors.

In the U.S., life settlements expanded rapidly in the early 2000s from less than $1 billion in 1999 to about $12 billion (face value) in 2008. Life settlements then contracted between 2008 and 2010 to about $7 billion. Although projection from before the financial crisis estimated that life settlements would increase to between $90 and $140 billion in face amount settled by 2016, it’s looking like those projections were far too ambitious.

As the market for U.S. life settlement policies expands into the U.K., Arbuthnot Latham—a U.K. investment bank—is cautioning investors that some life settlement funds may not be as they appear. In its Alternative Investments Thematic of July, Arbuthnot Latham provides a due-diligence primer for investment professionals evaluating life settlement funds. The report lists four primary concerns:

1. Funds over-promising on liquidity

According to the investment bank, “life settlement managers are offering short term (often quarterly) liquidity but allocating investors’ capital into a long-term and illiquid asset.” Despite the promise of liquidity, funds may halt redemptions or may be forced to borrow to meet redemptions. 

When examining a life settlement fund, determine whether the fund can keep its liquidity promises without compromising the stability of the fund.

2. Lack of Valuation Method Transparency

Another significant issue with some life settlement funds is their lack of valuation method transparency. According to the report, many fund managers contacted by the bank were reluctant, or even refused, to discuss their valuation methodologies. A lack of transparency is compounded when valuations are not verified by a third party. "In our minds, this lack of transparency creates a conflict of interest and is by no means independent," according to Arbuthnot Latham.

When examining a life settlement fund, determine whether the fund is forthcoming with its valuation method and whether valuations are subject to third-party verification.

3. Increased Life Expectancy

The next problem is that "people are living longer and therefore the life expectancy assumptions being used are often incorrect." Life spans increased significantly between 1979 and 2007. And some research indicates that life expectancies among the wealthy have increased even more. Because life settlements usually involve policies with a face value of at least $1 million, insureds whose policies end up in the secondary markets tend to live longer than the U.S. average.

When examining a life settlement fund, determine how the fund is dealing with increasing life expectancies.

4. Shortfalls Jeopardizing Premium Payments

Finally, payment of premiums requires that new subscriptions be brought in on a regular basis. If subscriptions dry up, life settlement funds may be unable to pay premiums and may be forced to allow policies to lapse. "In short, life settlement companies are betting that insurance companies have got it wrong. We would argue, in contrast, that life insurance companies have been getting it right for many years and will continue to profit from the business of insuring lives."

When examining a life settlement fund, determine how the fund will stay current on premiums if subscriptions drop below their projected level.

Conclusion

Each of the above concerns can alert investors and their advisors to life settlement funds that may not be able to keep their expansive promises. Life settlements may offer above-average returns that are uncorrelated to the markets—but that doesn’t mean they don’t carry significant risks. Because of the relative youth of life settlement funds, extensive due diligence is essential.

For additional coverage of this issue and similar ones, we invite you to sign up with AdvisorOne’s partner, AdvisorFX, for a free trial.

See also The Law Professor's blog at AdvisorFYI.

About the Author
William H. Byrnes, Esq.

William H. Byrnes, Esq.

Prof. William H. Byrnes, Esq., LL.M., CWM, Fellow

Prof. William H. Byrnes, Esq., LL.M., CWM, Fellow, is the leader of Summit Business Media's Financial Advisory Publications, having been appointed July 1, 2010. He has been an author and editor of 10 books and treatises and 17 chapters for Lexis-Nexis, Wolters Kluwer, Thomson-Reuters, Oxford University Press, Edward Elgar, and Wilmington, as well as numerous commissioned, peer-reviewed, and law review articles. He was a Senior Manager, then Associate Director of international tax for Coopers and Lybrand, which subsequently amalgamated into PricewaterhouseCoopers, practicing in Africa, Europe, Asia, and the Caribbean.

He has been commissioned and consulted by a number of governments on their tax and fiscal policy from policy formation to regime impact. He has served as an operational board member for companies in several industries including fashion, durable medical equipment, office furniture, and technology. Since 1994, he has been a professional trainer for professional association conferences, government workshops, and financial service institutions in-house meetings.

Before Associate Dean Byrnes joined the administration of Thomas Jefferson School of Law, he was a tenured law faculty member at St. Thomas School of Law. He serves on the Academic Committee of the American Academy of Financial Management. He created the first online graduate program offered to wealth managers and life insurance producers without any legal background—see http://llmprogram.tjsl.edu (Graduate Program of International Tax and Financial Services, Thomas Jefferson School of Law).

Email: wbyrnes@nationalunderwriteradvancedmarkets.com

About the Author
Robert Bloink, Esq., LL.M.

Robert Bloink, Esq., LL.M.

Robert Bloink is a professor of tax for the Graduate Program of International Tax and Financial Services, Thomas Jefferson School of Law.

Previously, he served as Senior Attorney in the IRS Office of Chief Counsel, Large and Mid-Sized Business Division, where he litigated many cases in the U.S. Tax Court, served as Liaison Counsel for the Offshore Compliance Technical Assistance Program, coordinated examination programs audit teams on the development of issues for large corporate taxpayers, and taught continuing education seminars to Senior Revenue Agents involved in Large Case Exams. In his governmental capacity, Mr. Bloink became recognized as an expert in the taxation of financial structured products and was responsible for the IRS’ first FSA addressing variable forward contracts. Mr. Bloink’s core competencies led to his involvement in prosecuting some of the biggest corporate tax shelters in the history or our country.

 

Mr. Bloink's insurance practice incorporates sophisticated wealth transfer techniques, as well as counseling institutions in the context of their insurance portfolios and other mortality based exposures. 

Comments

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.