IRS Issues Basis Guidance for Estates Electing Against the Estate Tax

More On Tax Planning

from The Advisor's Professional Library
  • Selected Provisions of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 The experts of Tax Facts have produced this comprehensive analysis of selected provisions of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (the Act) to provide the most up-to-date information to our subscribers. This supplement analyzes important changes to the tax code with emphasis on how these developments impact Tax Facts’ major areas of focus: Employee Benefits, Insurance, and Investments.
  • IRAs: Eligibility The eligibility rules for contributing to traditional and Roth IRAs are complicated. Learn how to effectively use them in retirement plans.

The IRS has dropped the second shoe; giving taxpayers guidance through the complex procedural machinations they must follow to avoid the 2010 estate tax.

The IRS released two pieces of guidance for estates of 2010 decedents. Today we discuss the one of the components, Revenue Procedure 2011-41, which provides a safe-harbor for executors of estates of 2010 decedents and beneficiaries of those estates. If the safe-harbor procedure is followed and the executor doesn’t take a contradictory position on a return, the IRS will not challenge the election against the estate tax or the basis allocations made by the executor.

Estates of decedents dying in 2010 have the option of electing not to be subject to the estate tax; but if the executor makes that election, beneficiaries will not receive the benefit of the stepped-up basis rules. Instead, property received under this regime will take the decedent’s basis in the property.

In addition to carryover basis, estates of decedents dying in 2010 that elect not to be subject to the estate tax have $1.3 million in allocable basis that can be allocated to property received by any beneficiary and another $3 million in allocable basis that can be allocated to property passing to the decedent’s spouse.

An executor makes the “Section 1022” election under the procedure outlined in Notice 2011-66. Section 1022 specifies how basis is allocated to property received by beneficiaries of 2010 estate that elects against the estate tax. When an executor makes a Section 1022 election, property transferred to beneficiaries is treated as if it was gifted to the beneficiaries. As a result, carry-over basis rules apply instead of the stepped-up basis rules that are applicable to estates that are subject to the estate tax.

It is important to note that Section 1022 applies only to “property received from a decedent,” meaning “property acquired by bequest, devise, or inheritance, or by the decedent's estate from the decedent.” It doesn’t include, for example, an interest in a qualified terminable interest property (QTIP) trust. 

Additionally, basis increase may not be allocated to two other types of property that otherwise would be property owned by and acquired from a decedent, as follows: (1) basis increase may not be allocated to property that was received by the decedent as a gift (partial or full) in the three year period ending on the date of the decedent’s death; and (2) basis increase may not be allocated to property to stock or securities of a foreign personal holding company, DISC (or former DISC), a foreign investment company, or a foreign passive investment company.

Under the safe-harbor, the executor should allocate basis on a property-by-property basis; but the total basis of any piece of property cannot exceed the property’s fair market value (FMV) as of the date of the decedent’s death. Basis allocation is very flexible, meaning that the executor can allocate basis to some but not all shares of a particular stock owned by the decedent. But there are limits to that flexibility; for instance, if the decedent owned a piece of real estate outright, an executor can’t allocate basis to a life estate in the property separately from the remainder interest in the property.

FMV under the Revenue Procedure and Section 1022 means the same thing as it does under the general estate tax provisions of the code, so general estate tax valuation principles will apply to the property. Also, the holding period of property acquired from a decedent and to which Section 1022 is applicable includes the decedent’s holding period plus the holding period of the beneficiary. And other tax attributes of the property in the hands of the decedent also pass to beneficiaries (e.g. capital gains status or 1245 status).

The 200+ page Revenue Procedure gives numerous examples and includes in-depth procedures that are applicable to specific situations and types of property. It became Aug. 29, but the IRS is allowing taxpayers to apply the procedure to prior periods.

For additional coverage of this issue and similar ones, we invite you to sign up with AdvisorOne’s partner, AdvisorFX, for a free trial.

See also The Law Professor's blog at AdvisorFYI.

About the Author
Robert Bloink, Esq., LL.M.

Robert Bloink, Esq., LL.M.

Robert Bloink is a professor of tax for the Graduate Program of International Tax and Financial Services, Thomas Jefferson School of Law.

Previously, he served as Senior Attorney in the IRS Office of Chief Counsel, Large and Mid-Sized Business Division, where he litigated many cases in the U.S. Tax Court, served as Liaison Counsel for the Offshore Compliance Technical Assistance Program, coordinated examination programs audit teams on the development of issues for large corporate taxpayers, and taught continuing education seminars to Senior Revenue Agents involved in Large Case Exams. In his governmental capacity, Mr. Bloink became recognized as an expert in the taxation of financial structured products and was responsible for the IRS’ first FSA addressing variable forward contracts. Mr. Bloink’s core competencies led to his involvement in prosecuting some of the biggest corporate tax shelters in the history or our country.

 

Mr. Bloink's insurance practice incorporates sophisticated wealth transfer techniques, as well as counseling institutions in the context of their insurance portfolios and other mortality based exposures. 

About the Author
William H. Byrnes, Esq.

William H. Byrnes, Esq.

Prof. William H. Byrnes, Esq., LL.M., CWM, Fellow

Prof. William H. Byrnes, Esq., LL.M., CWM, Fellow, is the leader of Summit Business Media's Financial Advisory Publications, having been appointed July 1, 2010. He has been an author and editor of 10 books and treatises and 17 chapters for Lexis-Nexis, Wolters Kluwer, Thomson-Reuters, Oxford University Press, Edward Elgar, and Wilmington, as well as numerous commissioned, peer-reviewed, and law review articles. He was a Senior Manager, then Associate Director of international tax for Coopers and Lybrand, which subsequently amalgamated into PricewaterhouseCoopers, practicing in Africa, Europe, Asia, and the Caribbean.

He has been commissioned and consulted by a number of governments on their tax and fiscal policy from policy formation to regime impact. He has served as an operational board member for companies in several industries including fashion, durable medical equipment, office furniture, and technology. Since 1994, he has been a professional trainer for professional association conferences, government workshops, and financial service institutions in-house meetings.

Before Associate Dean Byrnes joined the administration of Thomas Jefferson School of Law, he was a tenured law faculty member at St. Thomas School of Law. He serves on the Academic Committee of the American Academy of Financial Management. He created the first online graduate program offered to wealth managers and life insurance producers without any legal background—see http://llmprogram.tjsl.edu (Graduate Program of International Tax and Financial Services, Thomas Jefferson School of Law).

Email: wbyrnes@nationalunderwriteradvancedmarkets.com

Comments

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.