Remember Roths? Avoid Potential Tax Hikes With a Roth Conversion Now

More On Tax Planning

from The Advisor's Professional Library
  • Long Term Care Insurance: Premiums While premiums for qualified long-term-care insurance may be deductible as medical expenses there are exceptions to this general rule. Learn how to avoid unnecessary tax liabilities.
  • Health Insurance: Health and Medical Savings Accounts A Health Savings Account is a trust created exclusively for the purpose of paying qualified medical expenses of an account beneficiary. Although they are popular, they are not without their pitfalls and the regulations can be complicated. Learn more about how to avoid federal taxation on the accumulation and distributions of HSA.

Your clients’ tax rates will almost certainly be rising by the end of the year if the Bush-era tax cuts expire. Despite this, there is an opportunity to avoid some of these tax increases by using Roth conversions.  Instead of paying the potentially higher 2013-and-beyond tax rates on IRA funds, clients can roll their traditional IRA accounts into Roth IRAs, paying taxes on those funds at 2012 rates.  In 2012, almost all of your clients are good candidates for this solution, but the time to act is now—by the end of the year, the opportunity may be lost, and your clients left wondering why they are stuck paying more. 

Back to Basics: Benefits of a Roth Conversion

There can be substantial advantages to executing a Roth conversion in 2012.  As previously stated, tax rates are almost certain to rise in 2013, so your clients would be forced to take withdrawals at that higher tax rate. A traditional IRA is subject to minimum distribution requirements once a taxpayer reaches age 70½, so your clients would certainly incur the increased tax liability at that time, if not before. 

Although funds in both traditional and Roth IRAs grow tax-free, the traditional IRA grants only a tax deferral because the funds are contributed with pre-tax dollars but are taxed as ordinary income upon withdrawal. Amounts contributed to a Roth IRA are taxed when contributed instead of when they are withdrawn. What this means is that your client could execute a Roth conversion in 2012, pay taxes at the 2012 rates on the funds transferred into the Roth IRA, and avoid possible higher post-2012 tax rates completely when amounts are withdrawn from the Roth IRA.

Further, funds in the Roth IRA are not subject to the same minimum distribution requirements as a traditional IRA, so your clients could see their Roth funds grow tax-exempt for a longer period.

Who Is a Good Candidate?

In 2012, almost everyone is a good candidate for a Roth conversion.  As long as your client expects to remain in the same (or higher) tax bracket, the tax savings are likely to be substantial. Despite this, a Roth conversion requires payment of taxes upon conversion, so the client should have sufficient assets to make this payment. 

There are, of course, exceptions—for example, taxpayers who plan on dropping to a lower tax bracket in 2013 and beyond should wait to execute a Roth conversion at this lower tax rate. This might be the case if your client is planning to retire in 2013, drop to a lower tax bracket and take distributions at this lower rate.

What Happens If You Guess Wrong?

Sometimes the converted funds will fare poorly after a Roth conversion, or the client may convert too much and end up in a higher tax bracket the next year (though this is unlikely for 2012 Roth conversions because tax rates will most likely be higher in 2013). Because the goal of a Roth conversion is to pay less in taxes during the year that the conversion takes place than would be required for future distributions, an estimate of the future value of the funds is required because this value helps determine the minimum distribution requirements.

After the Roth conversion, if the value of the funds in the account drops to where the tax would be lower even at increased 2013 rates, your client may come to you looking for answers. Fortunately, if the results of a Roth conversion are poor, the transaction can be reversed—“recharacterized”—as late as October 15 of the year following the initial conversion. 

For example, if your client wishes to convert a $1 million traditional IRA, he would incur income tax liability on the $1 million at the time that the funds are converted.  If the value of the account drops significantly within the period for recharacterization, the client could transfer the funds back into the traditional IRA and reverse the income tax liability incurred on the $1 million. The next year, the client could try again to execute another Roth conversion, paying income taxes only on the reduced amount.

Conclusion

The possibility that tax rates will continue rising for the foreseeable future is very real. Because of this, 2012 is likely the last chance for your clients to take advantage of the relatively low 2012 rates by executing a Roth conversion.  At least for 2012, the risks are slight and the rewards potentially great.

See AdvisorOne’s Special Report22 Days of Tax Planning Advice for 2012, throughout the month of March.

For additional coverage of this issue and similar ones, we invite you to sign up with AdvisorOne’s Summit Business Media partner, AdvisorFX, for a free trial.

You may also be interested in signing up for a free trial with another Summit Business Media partner, Tax Facts Online.

Page 2 of 2
About the Author
William H. Byrnes, Esq.

William H. Byrnes, Esq.

Prof. William H. Byrnes, Esq., LL.M., CWM, Fellow

Prof. William H. Byrnes, Esq., LL.M., CWM, Fellow, is the leader of Summit Business Media's Financial Advisory Publications, having been appointed July 1, 2010. He has been an author and editor of 10 books and treatises and 17 chapters for Lexis-Nexis, Wolters Kluwer, Thomson-Reuters, Oxford University Press, Edward Elgar, and Wilmington, as well as numerous commissioned, peer-reviewed, and law review articles. He was a Senior Manager, then Associate Director of international tax for Coopers and Lybrand, which subsequently amalgamated into PricewaterhouseCoopers, practicing in Africa, Europe, Asia, and the Caribbean.

He has been commissioned and consulted by a number of governments on their tax and fiscal policy from policy formation to regime impact. He has served as an operational board member for companies in several industries including fashion, durable medical equipment, office furniture, and technology. Since 1994, he has been a professional trainer for professional association conferences, government workshops, and financial service institutions in-house meetings.

Before Associate Dean Byrnes joined the administration of Thomas Jefferson School of Law, he was a tenured law faculty member at St. Thomas School of Law. He serves on the Academic Committee of the American Academy of Financial Management. He created the first online graduate program offered to wealth managers and life insurance producers without any legal background—see http://llmprogram.tjsl.edu (Graduate Program of International Tax and Financial Services, Thomas Jefferson School of Law).

Email: wbyrnes@nationalunderwriteradvancedmarkets.com

About the Author
Robert Bloink, Esq., LL.M.

Robert Bloink, Esq., LL.M.

Robert Bloink is a professor of tax for the Graduate Program of International Tax and Financial Services, Thomas Jefferson School of Law.

Previously, he served as Senior Attorney in the IRS Office of Chief Counsel, Large and Mid-Sized Business Division, where he litigated many cases in the U.S. Tax Court, served as Liaison Counsel for the Offshore Compliance Technical Assistance Program, coordinated examination programs audit teams on the development of issues for large corporate taxpayers, and taught continuing education seminars to Senior Revenue Agents involved in Large Case Exams. In his governmental capacity, Mr. Bloink became recognized as an expert in the taxation of financial structured products and was responsible for the IRS’ first FSA addressing variable forward contracts. Mr. Bloink’s core competencies led to his involvement in prosecuting some of the biggest corporate tax shelters in the history or our country.

 

Mr. Bloink's insurance practice incorporates sophisticated wealth transfer techniques, as well as counseling institutions in the context of their insurance portfolios and other mortality based exposures. 

Comments

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.