Taking Back Control: Living Wills and Beyond

On the surface, living wills might seem as if they allow your clients to control the course of their medical treatment if they become incapacitated and cannot make decisions for themselves. In reality, the living will might provide a false sense of security.

Simple living wills are often rendered ineffective because they are unable to address every potential situation. It is critical that your clients know their options and understand the difference between opting for substituted judgment of a designated medical surrogate over the use of a living will. Discussing these alternatives will give your clients the knowledge they need to decide for themselves how their end-of-life treatment will be handled—and allow you to provide them with a type and level of control most will deem priceless.

Living Wills: The Basics

Living wills, also known as advance directives, allow your clients to make decisions about medical care while they are healthy and competent. In a life or death situation, the living will theoretically governs decisions such as whether extraordinary measures will be taken to save a patient’s life or whether life support machines will be used to keep the patient alive.

Your clients will assume that their wishes will be followed, and that the instructions they provided in advance will dictate the end-of-life care they will receive. They may use living wills to eliminate the burden on children and relatives who may not fully understand the patient’s wishes or who may be emotionally unable to make a difficult decision.

Complications

Despite the good intentions of the living will, complications frequently arise. Living wills are often simple documents that your client might find on the Internet or fill out in a hospital. No legal advice is required for a living will to be valid—and often no advice is sought.

Because of this, living wills are usually relatively vague. For example, your client may decide that he does not want to remain on life support if there is no possibility that a meaningful quality of life can be achieved. But what exactly constitutes a meaningful quality of life? And what if the doctor cannot provide concrete odds? Even if doctors have the advance directive in their hands, they may substitute their own judgment in uncertain situations based on fear of litigation.

In these scenarios, the decision falls to the patient’s family members, who may be poorly equipped to make the decision, or to doctors who have little knowledge of the patient—exactly the situation that the living will was meant to guard against.

Alternatives

A better way might be to think of a living will as the starting point for end-of-life decision making. Your clients do not want to delegate these important decisions to family or leave them solely in the hands of doctors, but in reality that’s often what happens. Therefore, it is important to provide the clearest instructions possible.

An advisor’s guidance can prove invaluable. Asking the difficult questions, such as what might constitute a “meaningful life” for a particular client, or the odds of medical recovery that they would be willing to accept, could provide clarity to otherwise murky terms. It is also important to advise your clients to have frequent conversations with their loved ones, so they can be prepared to decide. Technology, such as videotaped discussions about end-of-life preferences, can also be used to provide guidance as to a patient’s wishes.

In practice, it is likely that a combination of these approaches will provide your clients with the greatest degree of control over their medical care.

Conclusion

While a living will might be the best first step to give your clients control over end-of-life care should they become incapacitated, it’s by no means the only preparation needed. Advisors can help their clients provide more detailed instructions, while involving family members to make sure that everyone has a clear picture of the client’s wishes.

------------------

For additional coverage of this issue and similar ones, we invite you to sign up with AdvisorOne’s Summit Business Media partner, National Underwriter Advanced Markets, for a free trial.

You may also be interested in signing up for a free trial with another Summit Business Media partner, Tax Facts Online.

Page 2 of 2
About the Author
Robert Bloink, Esq., LL.M.

Robert Bloink, Esq., LL.M.

Robert Bloink is a professor of tax for the Graduate Program of International Tax and Financial Services, Thomas Jefferson School of Law.

Previously, he served as Senior Attorney in the IRS Office of Chief Counsel, Large and Mid-Sized Business Division, where he litigated many cases in the U.S. Tax Court, served as Liaison Counsel for the Offshore Compliance Technical Assistance Program, coordinated examination programs audit teams on the development of issues for large corporate taxpayers, and taught continuing education seminars to Senior Revenue Agents involved in Large Case Exams. In his governmental capacity, Mr. Bloink became recognized as an expert in the taxation of financial structured products and was responsible for the IRS’ first FSA addressing variable forward contracts. Mr. Bloink’s core competencies led to his involvement in prosecuting some of the biggest corporate tax shelters in the history or our country.

 

Mr. Bloink's insurance practice incorporates sophisticated wealth transfer techniques, as well as counseling institutions in the context of their insurance portfolios and other mortality based exposures. 

About the Author
William H. Byrnes, Esq.

William H. Byrnes, Esq.

Prof. William H. Byrnes, Esq., LL.M., CWM, Fellow

Prof. William H. Byrnes, Esq., LL.M., CWM, Fellow, is the leader of Summit Business Media's Financial Advisory Publications, having been appointed July 1, 2010. He has been an author and editor of 10 books and treatises and 17 chapters for Lexis-Nexis, Wolters Kluwer, Thomson-Reuters, Oxford University Press, Edward Elgar, and Wilmington, as well as numerous commissioned, peer-reviewed, and law review articles. He was a Senior Manager, then Associate Director of international tax for Coopers and Lybrand, which subsequently amalgamated into PricewaterhouseCoopers, practicing in Africa, Europe, Asia, and the Caribbean.

He has been commissioned and consulted by a number of governments on their tax and fiscal policy from policy formation to regime impact. He has served as an operational board member for companies in several industries including fashion, durable medical equipment, office furniture, and technology. Since 1994, he has been a professional trainer for professional association conferences, government workshops, and financial service institutions in-house meetings.

Before Associate Dean Byrnes joined the administration of Thomas Jefferson School of Law, he was a tenured law faculty member at St. Thomas School of Law. He serves on the Academic Committee of the American Academy of Financial Management. He created the first online graduate program offered to wealth managers and life insurance producers without any legal background—see http://llmprogram.tjsl.edu (Graduate Program of International Tax and Financial Services, Thomas Jefferson School of Law).

Email: wbyrnes@nationalunderwriteradvancedmarkets.com

Comments

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.