Will 2013 See the Demise of Donor-Advised Funds?

Charitable deductions are a hot topic in this year’s tax reform debates, but donor-advised funds have been singled out for potential elimination in 2013. Today, donor-advised funds provide a powerful tool to facilitate charitable giving by your upper-middle-class clients and offer a substantial current tax deduction and tax-free growth for contributions.

Donor-advised funds are similar to private foundations but can be used to streamline the giving process for much more modest donations, by allowing for larger deductions and low operating costs. Because of the uncertain future for the tax advantages surrounding charitable giving, your clients should act now to use donor-advised funds to lock in the deduction for tomorrow’s charitable gifts today.

Tax Basics of Donor-Advised Funds

The tax benefits afforded to donor-advised funds are substantial—your clients can deduct up to 50% of their adjusted gross income for cash contributions to the fund and up to 30% of adjusted gross income for donating securities. The deduction is allowable for the current year even if the actual charitable gift is not made until well into the future, so your client is protected against potential elimination of the deduction for future years.

Further, if the gift from the established donor-advised fund is not made until the future, contributions to the fund grow tax-free. For example, if your client wants to make a gift using stock that has appreciated in value, he might sell the stock, pay the capital gains tax on the sale, and give the remaining cash to charity.

But if that same client establishes a donor-advised fund and contributes the stock to the fund, the stock can appreciate in value within the fund tax-free. When it is later donated to charity, the client is not liable for the capital gains tax. The charitable gift is therefore maximized while your client minimizes his tax liability.

Donor-Advised Funds Versus Private Foundations

In theory, establishing a private foundation may seem like an appealing way to establish a systematic practice for charitable giving. However, few of your clients are likely find it to be a worthwhile tool because, while a private foundation can offer a donor more control over the assets, the expense of maintaining the foundation likely outweighs this benefit for most clients.

Private foundations generally provide a way for the very wealthy to establish large and ongoing strategies for charitable giving, but both the startup and maintenance costs are high—administrative costs can be as high as 8% of assets each year. Further, a private foundation is required to donate at least 5% of its assets to charity each year, but no similar requirement applies to donor-advised funds.

The allowable deductions for contributions to private foundations are also lower than those allowed with respect to donor-advised funds—a taxpayer is permitted to deduct only up to 30% of adjusted gross income for cash contributions to a private foundation (20% for contributions of securities).

Conclusion

Donor-advised funds provide a way for your clients to take advantage of the currently available tax deductions for charitable giving, but the time to act is now. By this time next year, tax reforms expected to be finalized later in 2012 could have entirely eliminated the strategy.

------------------

For additional coverage of this issue and similar ones, we invite you to sign up with AdvisorOne’s Summit Business Media partner, National Underwriter Advanced Markets, for a free trial.

You may also be interested in signing up for a free trial with another Summit Business Media partner, Tax Facts Online.

About the Author
William H. Byrnes, Esq.

William H. Byrnes, Esq.

Prof. William H. Byrnes, Esq., LL.M., CWM, Fellow

Prof. William H. Byrnes, Esq., LL.M., CWM, Fellow, is the leader of Summit Business Media's Financial Advisory Publications, having been appointed July 1, 2010. He has been an author and editor of 10 books and treatises and 17 chapters for Lexis-Nexis, Wolters Kluwer, Thomson-Reuters, Oxford University Press, Edward Elgar, and Wilmington, as well as numerous commissioned, peer-reviewed, and law review articles. He was a Senior Manager, then Associate Director of international tax for Coopers and Lybrand, which subsequently amalgamated into PricewaterhouseCoopers, practicing in Africa, Europe, Asia, and the Caribbean.

He has been commissioned and consulted by a number of governments on their tax and fiscal policy from policy formation to regime impact. He has served as an operational board member for companies in several industries including fashion, durable medical equipment, office furniture, and technology. Since 1994, he has been a professional trainer for professional association conferences, government workshops, and financial service institutions in-house meetings.

Before Associate Dean Byrnes joined the administration of Thomas Jefferson School of Law, he was a tenured law faculty member at St. Thomas School of Law. He serves on the Academic Committee of the American Academy of Financial Management. He created the first online graduate program offered to wealth managers and life insurance producers without any legal background—see http://llmprogram.tjsl.edu (Graduate Program of International Tax and Financial Services, Thomas Jefferson School of Law).

Email: wbyrnes@nationalunderwriteradvancedmarkets.com

About the Author
Robert Bloink, Esq., LL.M.

Robert Bloink, Esq., LL.M.

Robert Bloink is a professor of tax for the Graduate Program of International Tax and Financial Services, Thomas Jefferson School of Law.

Previously, he served as Senior Attorney in the IRS Office of Chief Counsel, Large and Mid-Sized Business Division, where he litigated many cases in the U.S. Tax Court, served as Liaison Counsel for the Offshore Compliance Technical Assistance Program, coordinated examination programs audit teams on the development of issues for large corporate taxpayers, and taught continuing education seminars to Senior Revenue Agents involved in Large Case Exams. In his governmental capacity, Mr. Bloink became recognized as an expert in the taxation of financial structured products and was responsible for the IRS’ first FSA addressing variable forward contracts. Mr. Bloink’s core competencies led to his involvement in prosecuting some of the biggest corporate tax shelters in the history or our country.

 

Mr. Bloink's insurance practice incorporates sophisticated wealth transfer techniques, as well as counseling institutions in the context of their insurance portfolios and other mortality based exposures. 

Comments

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.