Gift Now or Not? Impact of Pease Limit on Charitable Deductions

More On Tax Planning

from The Advisor's Professional Library
  • Long Term Care Insurance: Premiums While premiums for qualified long-term-care insurance may be deductible as medical expenses there are exceptions to this general rule. Learn how to avoid unnecessary tax liabilities.
  • Health Insurance: Health and Medical Savings Accounts A Health Savings Account is a trust created exclusively for the purpose of paying qualified medical expenses of an account beneficiary. Although they are popular, they are not without their pitfalls and the regulations can be complicated. Learn more about how to avoid federal taxation on the accumulation and distributions of HSA.

In the final days of 2012, we have only one tax certainty—no preference is safe, and the deduction for charitable donations that your high-net-worth clients rely on to reduce their tax rates is no exception. While many of your clients are left wondering if they should accelerate charitable giving into 2012 to ensure that they reap the benefits of the current deduction, others are looking ahead to an entirely different scenario. If leaders in Washington are unable to find middle ground, we’ll go over the so-called fiscal cliff, and a primary consequence of that leap may be higher income tax rates for all. The question then remains: how do you help clients plan for charitable giving when the deduction could be sharply limited in 2013 or become more valuable than ever?

The Target: Tax Deductions for Charitable Giving

While potentially steep increases in tax rates across the board tend to take center stage in the fiscal cliff news coverage, impending limits on itemized tax deductions can be equally important for many of your high net worth clients. The Pease limitation on itemized deductions is scheduled to be reinstated effective January 1, 2013, along with pre-Bush era tax rates. This limitation would institute a phaseout of itemized deductions—including deductions for charitable giving, mortgage interest, and state and local taxes—for taxpayers with adjusted gross income above a certain threshold level (President Obama’s proposals would start the phaseout at about $261,450 for a married couple, and $209,150 for individuals, though, absent compromise, the threshold that will be automatically reinstated is much lower—$174,450).

For taxpayers with income above the threshold amount for the year, the itemized deduction limit would be equal to the lesser of (a) 3% of adjusted gross income (AGI) above the threshold or (b) 80% of the itemized deductions that would otherwise be allowed.

In addition to the threat posed by the Pease limitation, both parties have pushed for caps on itemized deductions as part of a broader budget compromise: President Obama favors capping the charitable deduction at 28% for families earning over $250,000, while GOP proposals have advocated a general fixed dollar limit on itemized deductions.

For taxpayers who do not itemize deductions or meet the income thresholds, these limitations would likely have little direct impact on their tax bills. The impact of limiting itemized deductions could be dramatic, however, for those clients accustomed to making large charitable gifts each year.

The Planning Dilemma

If absolutely no compromise is reached in Congress, whether in the coming weeks or early in 2013, tax rates will increase and itemized deductions will be sharply limited for upper-middle class and high-net-worth clients. Clients looking to plan for this worst-case scenario should consider moving any large charitable gifts into 2012, whether through an outright donation or a donor advised fund (DAF) that pulls the deduction into the current year even if the gift is not made until the future.

If income tax rates are allowed to remain at 2012 levels, but deduction limitations are imposed to make up for the revenue shortfall this could cause, clients would likewise be better off accelerating gifts into 2012 to take advantage of the certainty of today’s deduction.

However, in the unlikely event that tax rates are allowed to increase, but rules for itemizing deductions are left in their current form, charitable gifts would become much more valuable in 2013 because they would shelter income that would otherwise be taxed at the higher rates.

The bottom line is that we do not know what will happen in 2013, but the time is upon us to ensure that clients are advised of the possible outcomes so that they can make an educated decision as to the amount of risk they’re willing to accept as the fiscal cliff deadline approaches. 

-----

We invite you to visit the AdvisorOne Fiscal Cliff landing page for up-to-date coverage on the fiscal cliff negotiations and the implications of going over the cliff.

For additional coverage of this issue and similar ones, we invite you to sign up with AdvisorOne’s Summit Business Media partner, National Underwriter Advanced Markets, for a free trial.

You may also be interested in signing up for a free trial with another Summit Business Media partner, Tax Facts Online.

Page 2 of 2
About the Author
William H. Byrnes, Esq.

William H. Byrnes, Esq.

Prof. William H. Byrnes, Esq., LL.M., CWM, Fellow

Prof. William H. Byrnes, Esq., LL.M., CWM, Fellow, is the leader of Summit Business Media's Financial Advisory Publications, having been appointed July 1, 2010. He has been an author and editor of 10 books and treatises and 17 chapters for Lexis-Nexis, Wolters Kluwer, Thomson-Reuters, Oxford University Press, Edward Elgar, and Wilmington, as well as numerous commissioned, peer-reviewed, and law review articles. He was a Senior Manager, then Associate Director of international tax for Coopers and Lybrand, which subsequently amalgamated into PricewaterhouseCoopers, practicing in Africa, Europe, Asia, and the Caribbean.

He has been commissioned and consulted by a number of governments on their tax and fiscal policy from policy formation to regime impact. He has served as an operational board member for companies in several industries including fashion, durable medical equipment, office furniture, and technology. Since 1994, he has been a professional trainer for professional association conferences, government workshops, and financial service institutions in-house meetings.

Before Associate Dean Byrnes joined the administration of Thomas Jefferson School of Law, he was a tenured law faculty member at St. Thomas School of Law. He serves on the Academic Committee of the American Academy of Financial Management. He created the first online graduate program offered to wealth managers and life insurance producers without any legal background—see http://llmprogram.tjsl.edu (Graduate Program of International Tax and Financial Services, Thomas Jefferson School of Law).

Email: wbyrnes@nationalunderwriteradvancedmarkets.com

About the Author
Robert Bloink, Esq., LL.M.

Robert Bloink, Esq., LL.M.

Robert Bloink is a professor of tax for the Graduate Program of International Tax and Financial Services, Thomas Jefferson School of Law.

Previously, he served as Senior Attorney in the IRS Office of Chief Counsel, Large and Mid-Sized Business Division, where he litigated many cases in the U.S. Tax Court, served as Liaison Counsel for the Offshore Compliance Technical Assistance Program, coordinated examination programs audit teams on the development of issues for large corporate taxpayers, and taught continuing education seminars to Senior Revenue Agents involved in Large Case Exams. In his governmental capacity, Mr. Bloink became recognized as an expert in the taxation of financial structured products and was responsible for the IRS’ first FSA addressing variable forward contracts. Mr. Bloink’s core competencies led to his involvement in prosecuting some of the biggest corporate tax shelters in the history or our country.

 

Mr. Bloink's insurance practice incorporates sophisticated wealth transfer techniques, as well as counseling institutions in the context of their insurance portfolios and other mortality based exposures. 

Comments

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.