How to Evaluate Lower-Priced Guaranteed Lifetime Income VAs

Variable annuities with guaranteed lifetime benefits have become increasingly popular among clients planning for retirement income in recent years. However, like any other valuable product, these annuities come with a price tag that may make them impractical or undesirable for clients because of high fees that can easily exceed 3.5% of assets annually.

These clients are not alone: insurance carriers are also feeling the financial strain that comes from offering these costly products. As a result, many companies have begun to offer simplified versions of the traditional variable annuity with a lifetime income guarantee, with reduced fee structures. While clients may be relieved to see these lower sticker prices, it will often be up to the financial advisor to navigate the product features—and possible benefit tradeoffs—in this new sea of lower-cost annuity options.

The Problem with Today’s Variable Annuities

The market turbulence of the past half-decade caused many clients who previously rejected the idea of tying their assets into low-risk annuity products to reevaluate their positions. The popularity of variable annuity products has soared in the intervening years. This has prompted many insurance carriers to develop highly specialized—and equally complicated—variable annuity products geared toward increasing the marketability of these products.

In today’s annuity world, the options are almost limitless: clients can include riders to provide for long-term care, inflation protection, or life insurance-type death benefits, among others. This array of possibilities can make for a market in which many—if not most—clients have a difficult time understanding the benefits they are actually purchasing.

One of the more desirable annuity product features is the guaranteed lifetime income benefit. For many clients, these products represent a tradeoff because they offer relatively low returns in exchange for the promise of a guaranteed income stream for life. Importantly for some, these products allow the client to participate in the stock market without the same level of risk because the lifetime income stream is guaranteed.

This guarantee comes with a price tag that can increase the total annual annuity fee by over 1%, however, bringing the total annual fee to around 3.5% of the assets in the client’s account. Since the annual guaranteed returns on a variable annuity are low to begin with (at maybe 5% or 6%), it may be difficult for some clients to justify these fees. Further, even with these fees, today’s low interest rate environment has made it difficult for the insurance company to profit from products offering guaranteed living benefits.

A Cost-Effective Simplification

In response to consumer confusion and reduced profitability, many major insurance carriers have begun to offer simplified versions of the variable annuity with lifetime income guarantee with annual lower fees closer to 2% of account asset value in some cases.

These products continue to guarantee an income payout each year for life, which is all that many clients really want in the first place. The company guarantees that the percentage payout will be based on the value of the assets that the client initially invests in the account, and no less. If the market performs well, the percentage may be based on the higher value of the appreciated assets.

This is where the underlying asset allocation becomes important—some insurance carriers allow the client to invest primarily in stocks (up to 80% in some cases), while others require closer to a 50-50 mix between stocks and bonds. Other carriers limit the client to a choice of several portfolio options—for example, the client must select one of three different portfolios of stocks and bonds chosen and managed by the carrier. While this professional guidance and simplification may be invaluable for some clients, others may prefer to exercise more control over their investment choice.

Some of these products also offer a deferral option that can allow the client to increase the eventual payout rate, meaning that the insurance company guarantees that the value upon which the payout is eventually based will rise by a certain amount in the years that the client waits before beginning the lifetime income stream.

Conclusion

In many cases, the only reason that a client is willing to consider an annuity product is because of one or more of the specific benefit choices that are now available. For many other clients, however, the maze of benefit options—and associated higher fees—deters them from entering the market at all. For these clients, a product with a guaranteed lifetime income stream at lower cost can be a perfect match.

-----

For additional coverage of this issue and similar ones, we invite you to sign up with AdvisorOne’s Summit Business Media partner, National Underwriter Advanced Markets, for a free trial.

You may also be interested in signing up for a free trial with another Summit Business Media partner, Tax Facts Online.

 

About the Author
Robert Bloink, Esq., LL.M.

Robert Bloink, Esq., LL.M.

Robert Bloink is a professor of tax for the Graduate Program of International Tax and Financial Services, Thomas Jefferson School of Law.

Previously, he served as Senior Attorney in the IRS Office of Chief Counsel, Large and Mid-Sized Business Division, where he litigated many cases in the U.S. Tax Court, served as Liaison Counsel for the Offshore Compliance Technical Assistance Program, coordinated examination programs audit teams on the development of issues for large corporate taxpayers, and taught continuing education seminars to Senior Revenue Agents involved in Large Case Exams. In his governmental capacity, Mr. Bloink became recognized as an expert in the taxation of financial structured products and was responsible for the IRS’ first FSA addressing variable forward contracts. Mr. Bloink’s core competencies led to his involvement in prosecuting some of the biggest corporate tax shelters in the history or our country.

 

Mr. Bloink's insurance practice incorporates sophisticated wealth transfer techniques, as well as counseling institutions in the context of their insurance portfolios and other mortality based exposures. 

About the Author
William H. Byrnes, Esq.

William H. Byrnes, Esq.

Prof. William H. Byrnes, Esq., LL.M., CWM, Fellow

Prof. William H. Byrnes, Esq., LL.M., CWM, Fellow, is the leader of Summit Business Media's Financial Advisory Publications, having been appointed July 1, 2010. He has been an author and editor of 10 books and treatises and 17 chapters for Lexis-Nexis, Wolters Kluwer, Thomson-Reuters, Oxford University Press, Edward Elgar, and Wilmington, as well as numerous commissioned, peer-reviewed, and law review articles. He was a Senior Manager, then Associate Director of international tax for Coopers and Lybrand, which subsequently amalgamated into PricewaterhouseCoopers, practicing in Africa, Europe, Asia, and the Caribbean.

He has been commissioned and consulted by a number of governments on their tax and fiscal policy from policy formation to regime impact. He has served as an operational board member for companies in several industries including fashion, durable medical equipment, office furniture, and technology. Since 1994, he has been a professional trainer for professional association conferences, government workshops, and financial service institutions in-house meetings.

Before Associate Dean Byrnes joined the administration of Thomas Jefferson School of Law, he was a tenured law faculty member at St. Thomas School of Law. He serves on the Academic Committee of the American Academy of Financial Management. He created the first online graduate program offered to wealth managers and life insurance producers without any legal background—see http://llmprogram.tjsl.edu (Graduate Program of International Tax and Financial Services, Thomas Jefferson School of Law).

Email: wbyrnes@nationalunderwriteradvancedmarkets.com

Comments

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.