-
By Melanie Waddell, AdvisorOne |
June 1, 2012
Their collective rallying cry: an SRO isn’t needed—particularly if that SRO is FINRA. What to do instead? Fund the SEC so that it can conduct more frequent advisor exams.
-
By Jack Herstein, NASAA |
June 1, 2012
Bachus’ SRO bill would impose rigid exam standards on state regulators without corresponding standards on either the SEC or SROs.
-
By Melanie Waddell, AdvisorOne |
May 22, 2012
The House Financial Services Committee announced Wednesday that it will hold a hearing on June 6 on the redraft of Rep. Spencer Bachus’ bill calling for an SRO to oversee advisors.
-
By Melanie Waddell, AdvisorOne |
May 22, 2012
House Financial Services Chairman Spencer Bachus reintroduced in late April his draft bill calling for a self-regulatory organization (SRO) for advisors.
-
By David Tittsworth, IAA |
May 14, 2012
Some of the answers: FINRA is the only viable option that has been identified as an SRO and, as Mercer Bullard commented, "the bill would impose a tax on small advisory businesses...and mainstream investors they represent."
-
By Melanie Waddell, AdvisorOne |
April 25, 2012
House Financial Services Chairman Spencer Bachus reintroduced on Wednesday his draft bill calling for an SRO for advisors—one week after industry sources told AdvisorOne that an SRO bill was imminent.
-
By Bob Clark, AdvisorOne |
September 20, 2011
Perhaps the worst setback: DOL to reconsider its fiduciary rule for retirement plans.
-
By David Tittsworth, IAA |
September 20, 2011
After testifying before the House subcommittee on the draft legislation, our intrepid blogger explores and explains what it means for advisors.
-
By Bob Clark, AdvisorOne |
September 13, 2011
Fi360’s Kristina Fausti delivers the good news-bad news message on Spencer Bachus’ draft SRO bill. Will Republicans protect small businesses, like advisory firms?